Skip to content
Professional workflow research · no live case actions
overtaxed
Worked case / 2024 public records

Inspect the evidence.
Including what it cannot prove.

A source-linked reconstruction of one historical reduction: comparable screening, adverse evidence, exclusions and unresolved questions kept visible for professional review.

Historical public-data example. Not reviewed by counsel; not a recommendation, appraisal or explanation of the Board’s decision.

  • Jefferson Township
  • Class 203 residence
  • 2024 certified values
  • Board outcome shown only as context
01 / Inspect the work, including the answer “not established”Verified public records · researched September 18, 2026
OVERTAXED / Public-data case review
Historical example · Unreviewed by counsel

2024 residential / Jefferson Township

6913 W Summerdale Ave, Chicago

PIN 13-07-124-059-0000 · Class 203 · Neighborhood 71430

CCAO certified AV
$33,000
BOR final AV
$27,362
Recorded change
−$5,638 (−17.08%)

Finding from the reconstructed five-property set

The public comparable case does not independently support the historical reduction.

The subject’s certified improvement AV per building square foot was $23.116. The retained-comparable median was also $23.116. Both the subject and comparable median had a certified total assessed value of $33,000.

Retained set / five properties

Value-blind screening, then feature review

Certified improvement AV / building sf

Scroll horizontally to inspect every field

PropertyDistanceYearBuilding sfCertified total AVImprovement AV/sf
Subject ↗—19531,022$33,000$23.116
6917 W Summerdale Ave ↗Adjacent; exact area, lot and age. Extra half bath and superior interior features disclosed.0.007 mi19531,022$33,000$23.116
6916 W Summerdale Ave ↗Same block; higher assessed value retained. Warm-air heat and a 48 sf size difference.0.033 mi19541,070$38,400$27.126
6920 W Summerdale Ave ↗Same block; no garage and a formal recreation room are offsetting differences.0.035 mi19541,070$33,000$22.079
6917 W Farragut Ave ↗Nearby; slightly newer and larger, with a smaller 1.5-car garage.0.107 mi19551,056$34,000$23.319
6965 W Balmoral Ave ↗Lower value retained; smaller lot and garage, partial attic and recreation room disclosed.0.111 mi19541,022$30,803$21.600

6917 W Summerdale Ave — Adjacent; exact area, lot and age. Extra half bath and superior interior features disclosed.

6916 W Summerdale Ave — Same block; higher assessed value retained. Warm-air heat and a 48 sf size difference.

6920 W Summerdale Ave — Same block; no garage and a formal recreation room are offsetting differences.

6917 W Farragut Ave — Nearby; slightly newer and larger, with a smaller 1.5-car garage.

6965 W Balmoral Ave — Lower value retained; smaller lot and garage, partial attic and recreation room disclosed.

Inspect the selection method and its limits

Screen: Same 2024 year, neighborhood and class; within one mile and ±25% building area. Then single-card, non-multiland (one land line), whole-tieback parcels with matching use, story, quality, basement and A/C; building and land area within ±15%, age within ten years.

Rank: Distance in miles + proportional building-area difference + year-built difference / 30 + proportional land-area difference. Lower is closer. Assessment level was not an input. Manual feature review excluded the fourth-ranked, two-full-bath property before retaining five.

Important limit: This case was deliberately selected from historical reductions. It is not random, representative or a success-rate estimate. The analysis is retrospective, not preregistered; no physical-feature adjustments or market-value appraisal were performed.

Stages stay separate: The comparison uses certified, pre-BOR assessments. Final BOR values are shown only as historical outcomes. The higher-assessed candidate’s home-improvement-exemption field remains unresolved; the displayed figures are gross certified values, not exemption-adjusted taxable amounts.

Exclusions stay visible

A low number is not enough.

  • $11,200 total AV6905 W Balmoral: hard excluded—0.2 tieback, smaller site, slab, no A/C and different room count.
  • $11,400 total AV6911 W Berwyn: hard excluded—0.2 tieback and land area outside tolerance.
  • $37,000 total AV6913 W Farragut: excluded after manual review—two full baths versus the subject’s one.
  • $32,000 total AV6755 W Higgins: disclosed, not cherry-picked—larger home and lot, no garage and materially lower similarity rank.

Open questions before professional use

The missing evidence matters.

  1. 01

    Actual appeal fileThe public outcome omits submitted exhibits, hearing notes and decision detail.

  2. 02

    Record cards and photosPublic characteristics can be stale; physical facts and condition need confirmation.

  3. 03

    Sale qualificationThe 2018 trustee-deed sale needs deed, closing and market context before use.

  4. 04

    Exemption contextThe source reports a $2,400 certified HIE field for 6916 W Summerdale; its treatment needs confirmation.

  5. 05

    Method sensitivityAnalyst-set distance and feature tolerances need replication and robustness review.

Assessed values—not market values or tax dollarsNo requested value calculated · No appeal recommendation

02 / Source provenance

A trail to inspect,
not a score to trust.

All values shown above were reconstructed from official public datasets retrieved September 18, 2026. Public datasets are mutable; this is a worked research example, not a frozen agency record.

Open the Cook County Data Catalog

Appeal ID, type, generic reason and certified-to-final outcome

Mailed, certified and BOR land, improvement and total assessed values

Card-level physical characteristics and grain controls

Neighborhood and parcel centroid

Situs address

The subject’s recorded 2018 sale

Agency guidanceBOR / CCAO

BOR uniformity guidance ↗ · CCAO residential guidance ↗. Direction for comparable selection—not endorsement of this screen or ranking.

After inspecting the case

Where would your review
need more context?

We’re looking for candid practitioner feedback on the evidence, omissions and handoff—not validation of a predetermined product.

A 20-minute practitioner conversation.

No sales deck. No client names, credentials, documents or live case data.

Discuss the case

Research-stage workflow. Overtaxed does not file appeals, provide legal advice, represent taxpayers or make automated reduction recommendations.